O
Reynoldsburg
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

166 Cady Court variance

Reynoldsburg

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jan 15, 2026.

Public comments (5)

SupportiveJeff BorovetzJan 15, 2026

The Suncraft representative argued the angled rear line and curved cul-de-sac frontage create a genuine hardship and noted neighboring porches encroach further without issue.

Planning & Zoning Board - Jan 15, 2026 · 11:02 →
SupportiveRichard VerhoevenJan 15, 2026

The homeowner of 30 years explained he originally built the deck for his late mother and just wants a roof over the existing footprint, with no neighbor objections.

Planning & Zoning Board - Jan 15, 2026 · 23:16 →
SupportiveHenry WestJan 15, 2026

A neighbor with an identical porch by the same builder praised its appearance and called the four-foot request a small ask.

Planning & Zoning Board - Jan 15, 2026 · 25:25 →
SupportiveJoe MelisiJan 15, 2026

The neighbor across the street said the angled lot line and cul-de-sac curve limit rear-yard usability and called the request reasonable, case-specific relief.

Planning & Zoning Board - Jan 15, 2026 · 26:31 →
SupportivePatrick WestJan 15, 2026

A local real estate agent who sold most homes in the neighborhood said adjacent neighbors reviewed and approved the plans and the porch would add value.

Planning & Zoning Board - Jan 15, 2026 · 28:04 →